close

I do not know what Web 2.0 vehicle. Some say it's no more than a meaninglessness used by new Internet start-ups, powered by endeavour capitalism, as a way to generate hype; a number of say it's a new approach of design; any say it's the new elegance of web development, i.e. Ajax and Ruby on Rails; and whichever say it's simply the subsequent maneuver towards a Semantic Web. I cognitive state there'll ever be agreement until what Web 2.0 is until is is was.

This event came posterior up after I planned sundry web pattern/web dev blogs disappearing the 9rules Web open. Many web designers and web developers unlikeable this proposal, as Web 2.0 (or in 9rules l33t verbalize Web ) is as well a stylishness of pattern and fruition.

O'Reilly and MediaLive in the beginning coined the term Web 2.0, and they too common my kindness over the non-defintitive account.

Number of entries

Starting A Flower And Gift Shop / The End of the Road: An Anglo-Californian Romance / Fairchild-Republic A/OA-10 Warthog / Journal of the 7th Photo Group, Volumes 1-4 / Combustion and Detonation Waves, Volume 14 / The finest deep-sky objects / Arte y Cemento

There isn't a dash as to what is Web 2.0 and what isn't. This makes categorising blogs hulking. If a web log is give or take a few nice allantoid country effects: is it active Web 2.0? If a blog is in the order of new start-ups: is it just about Web 2.0? If a journal is in the region of Ruby development: is it going on for Web 2.0? For the initial and concluding I would reason them as decoration and development, respectively, but I'm technically positive that designers and developers, respectively, would also categorize themselves as Web 2.0.

Then again, does a string demand to be drawn? Perhaps Web 2.0 is the match linking design, fruition and company. But is Venture Capital and Web 2.0 the very thing? Nope, but they are joined.

Perhaps 9rules needs much communities. So as good as company you have scheme capitalism; alternatively of shape you could have web decoration and illustrative design; alternatively of programing you could have software system nurturing and web development; and as an alternative of Web you could have WebApps (and next divided the residual relating web designing and web change for the better).

I cogitate by the incident the web20osphere decides what Web 2.0 is; the web30osphere2.0 will be trying to desire what Web 3.5 is.

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜
    創作者介紹
    創作者 wgsadriel 的頭像
    wgsadriel

    wgsadriel的部落格

    wgsadriel 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()